• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9739
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
EVENTS
West England Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
    • Get involved
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Business
  • Features
  • Region
VIDEO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Get involved
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Business
  • Features
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
West England Bylines
Home News Environment

Government decision on Stonehenge back in court

Stonehenge Alliance keep up the pressure on the UK Government to shelve plans which will damage this UNESCO World Heritage Site.

The Editor by The Editor
22 May 2024
in Environment, Heritage, Transport, Wiltshire
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Stonehenge - Diego Delso - CC BY-SA 3 0

Stonehenge - Diego Delso - CC BY-SA 3 0

Share on Bluesky

Stonehenge Alliance Press Release – 21 May 2024.


Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site (SSWHS) [1] has been given permission to appeal the decision earlier this year by Mr Justice Holgate [2]. He dismissed SSWHS’s application for judicial review of the Government’s decision to approve a highly damaging, £2.5bn road scheme through Stonehenge World Heritage Site, for a second time [3].

UNESCO [4], five planning inspectors [5] and over 238,000 people [6] are all opposed to National Highways’ highly damaging plans. Save Stonehenge WHS’s legal action had been the only thing stopping the giant earthmovers from entering this 5,000-year-old landscape.

John Adams, chair of the Stonehenge Alliance [7] and one of the 3 directors of SSWHS, said:

“This is extremely good news. All those who care passionately about our cultural heritage can breathe a sigh of relief. We now have a new opportunity for the Government decision to be thoroughly scrutinised.

“This road scheme would be incredibly damaging to Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Yet, the Government doesn’t seem to care and is desperately trying to bulldoze through this decision before it is thrown out of office. It also shows how National Highways was premature in pressing ahead with its hugely disruptive A360 works.”

Leigh Day solicitor Rowan Smith said:

“This news is very encouraging for our client. In granting permission to appeal, the Court of Appeal acknowledged the scale of public interest around ensuring that a decision about the future of Stonehenge is lawful. 

“The Court said there is a compelling reason for an appeal hearing. Our client is looking forward to presenting arguments about the fairness of the decision-making process relating to the future of Stonehenge as well as compliance with international law protecting the World Heritage Site.”

SSWHS now has to raise a further £34,000 for the Appeal Court hearing [8].

– ENDS –


Footnotes:

[1] Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site is a limited company set up by three individuals closely associated with the Stonehenge Alliance to specifically challenge the original Government decision on 12 November 2020 to approve National Highways’ damaging scheme.

SSWHS applied for a judicial review of the Government’s second approval of the scheme on 14 July, 2023 (six days before the Somerset and Frome by-election).

[2] Mr Justice Holgate’s judgement dismissed SSWHS’s application for judicial review after a three day hearing was held on 12-14 December at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

[3] The first judicial review was held 23-25 June 2021, with the judgement being handed down by Mr Justice Holgate on 30 July 2021, quashing the Development Consent Order.

[4] See UNESCO World Heritage Committee decision from its September 2023 committee meeting in Riyadh.

[5] The Examination Report, dated 2 January, 2020 recommended that the application be refused. It was published on 12 November, 2020, when the Secretary of State made his first decision to approve the scheme.

[6] The Stonehenge Alliance has two petitions, one for residents in the UK (38 Degrees) and one for people outside the UK (Change.org). The combined total stands at over 238,000 with signatures from at least 147 countries worldwide.

[7] The Stonehenge Alliance supporter-organisations are: Ancient Sacred Landscape Network; Campaign to Protect Rural England; Friends of the Earth; Rescue, the British Archaeological Trust; and Transport Action Network.

[8] The CrowdJustice page has a new target of £134,000. This is to raise the additional funds needed for the hearing at the Court of Appeal.


We want to hear your views. Please send any comments to editor@westenglandbylines.co.uk

Previous Post

Four courts and a seaside

Next Post

The Great British Sewage Scandal

The Editor

The Editor

Related Posts

The kidical Mass kids cycling on the streets of Oxford
Oxfordshire

Why Oxford’s children are taking to two wheels

by Dr Hazel Dawe
2 October 2026
Picture of a chirch nestled behind a hill down a country track
Gloucestershire

Heritage Open Days and ‘Ride and Stride’ make a great day out

by Bob Copeland
30 September 2026
Two old cars parked on a European square
Economy

An automotive challenge: the European nations still driving outdated vehicles

by Rebecca Kotey
5 September 2026
Illustration of a person with a raised fist above larger scale hands clasped in solidarity, behind the person is a red sun
Environment

Review: Global Justice Report 2026: A plan for equality & prosperity within planetary boundaries

by Bob Copeland
8 August 2026
Photo of a field of pine saplings under a large polytunnel
Environment

Urban problems: nature-based solutions and a Green New Deal everywhere

by Steve Dawe
1 August 2026
Next Post
Water drop – © Erda Estremera on Unsplash

The Great British Sewage Scandal

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Advice Arctic Artificial Intelligence Autism Best for Britain Brexit Bristol climate Climate Change Community Cotswolds Craftivism Democracy Development Domestic Violence Economics Education Environment EU Farage Flood Gaza General Election Global Warming Housing Human Nature Oxford Pedestrian Planning pollution Populism Press release Private Equity Putin Region sewage technology Traffic Transport Trump University of Oxford VAWG video Westbury People's Gallery World War II
West England Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in West England and beyond.

West England Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Get involved
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 West England Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9739

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Media
    • Transport
    • World
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Farming
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Features
    • Broken Britain
    • Climate Emergency
    • Ukraine Conflict
    • Women in Focus
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Electoral Reform
    • Equality
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
  • Society
    • Book Reviews
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Heritage
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Region
    • Bristol and Bath
    • Gloucestershire
    • Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    • Oxfordshire
    • Swindon
    • Wiltshire
    • Society
  • Opinion
  • Cartoons
  • Events
  • Sewage Watch
  • Get involved
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 West England Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9739