• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9739
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
EVENTS
West England Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
    • Get involved
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Business
  • Features
  • Region
VIDEO
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • Get involved
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Business
  • Features
  • Region
No Result
View All Result
West England Bylines
Home Society Culture

The Nobel Prizes – time for a rethink?

A former member of the Nobel Prize awarding committee muses on whether they have outlived their usefulness

Erik Änggård by Erik Änggård
21 February 2026
in Culture, Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
A Nobel prize in chemistry.   image by Adam Baker. Flickr CC BY 2.0

A Nobel prize in chemistry. image by Adam Baker. Flickr CC BY 2.0

Share on Bluesky

The Nobel Prizes – Time for a rethink?

A lifetime with Nobel

A few months ago we had the news from the Nobel Committees in Stockholm and Oslo. This evokes a number of sentimental memories for me. The Nobel Prizes were very much part of my early life in Sweden. My father was a doctor and some of his friends were members of the Nobel Assembly, the group of 50 scientists at the Karolinska Institutet, which selects the medical Nobel Prize winners.

After a dinner party at home, the men would often discuss different medical discoveries. Was it prize-worthy? Who were the main contributors? Were they too many? A science and medicine Nobel Prize could only be shared by three individuals

The Nobel banquets and lectures were on the tenth of December each year, Alfred Nobel’s birthday. They were brilliant white tie parties at the Stockholm City Hall. Speeches, music, fanfares, a sumptuous banquet followed by dancing. Students were invited to mingle with the Nobel laureates and my friends and I were usually there. In 1977, I became a professor at the Institute and a member of the Nobel Assembly.

Aula Medica, Karolinska Institutet image by Sinikka Halme. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

Having doubts

It has all been very interesting and good fun. However, with the perspective of old age, I find that I am having doubts whether the Nobel Prizes still serve the purpose that Alfred Nobel intended with his will, written in 1895.

Nobel was a chemist and engineer by training. He wanted to improve the conditions for top scientists. For instance, his friend Madame Curie struggled financially and did not have a proper laboratory. Today the top scientists are often well supported by grants and have large laboratories. Many don’t need more money.

In Nobel’s time most scientists worked alone, or in small groups. It was therefore possible to identify the main contributor to a discovery. Today most discoveries are made by teams. This is good. As the Nobel Prize only can be given to a maximum of three people this means that some of the best discoveries can now not be rewarded.

The prestige of the Nobel Prizes distorts the collaborative culture in science. I have observed that some top scientists may have elected to withdraw from collaboration as it might dilute their position as potential candidates for a Nobel Prize.

The Nobel Prize selections for literature, peace and economics have always been disputed, as they are subjective rather than objective. It is a matter of taste and preference. The selection process becomes difficult and the outcome often controversial, which is not what Nobel intended.

I wonder what Alfred Nobel would make of the situation we are in now? Ragnar Sohlman was a young chemical engineer working with Nobel in the years before he died. He became Alfred Nobel’s executor and later wrote a book about Alfred Nobel and his legacy. From this book it is possible to guess his thoughts.

Happy with his legacy?

I think that in many respects he would be very happy with his legacy. His prize is without a doubt the top international prize in science, literature and peace. However, he may well make the same observations that I have outlined above and decide to modify his will as follows:

The Nobel Prizes would no longer given to the top scientists and established writers. They are now well supported and rewarded. It is also increasingly difficult to find just three scientists behind a new discovery or development.

The Nobel foundation should instead find ways of supporting young scientists in physics, chemistry, medicine and emerging subjects such as artificial intelligence and computer science with generous Nobel grants. Rather than a peace prize there would be an annual Nobel award for civil courage in support of good human values.

The awards should be made on Alfred Nobel’s birthday as before but the old-fashioned, elitist process modernised.

My old Swedish friends will probably think that I have gone mad to question the Nobel Prizes. They may be right, but it is rather enjoyable to be an outrageous old man!

Please give me your thoughts!


Editor’s note: We are publishing this as an opinion piece and are open to your views. You can contact us at editor@westenglandbylines.co.uk


Infographics from Easyfundraising

We are registered with easyfundraising! 8,000 brands will donate to us for free every time you use it.

It’s super quick and easy to SIGN UP, and will never cost you anything whatsoever. It’s FREE for you and HUGE for us!

Previous Post

First Bus price hike: when catching the bus is a luxury

Next Post

New Vision for Water

Erik Änggård

Erik Änggård

Erik Änggård (Erik Anggard in the UK) is a retired medical scientist and a former Professor of Pharmacology. He worked first at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm where he served on the Nobel Assembly, then later as a director at the William Harvey Research Institute in London. He now writes reflective essays on trust, values and personal experiences

Related Posts

A row of Oxford houses
Housing

The case against houses in multiple occupation – part one

by Steve Dawe
13 September 2026
Photo of the Ofcom office in London
Media

Regulators: who watches the watchers?

by Don McGowan
10 September 2026
Farm workers in high-visibility vests spraying a green field with a tractor in the background.
Brexit

Will the UK Government change the immigration narrative before it’s too late?

by Rob Jones
4 September 2026
Forest fire burning through a dense forest, flames lapping between dark tree trunks at dusk.
Climate Emergency

The climate crisis: a war on the world

by Paul Ryder
19 August 2026
Photo of arches in Parc du Cinquantenaire, Brussels
Europe

Born a European

by Jon Hill
14 August 2026
Next Post
Sewage treatment works at Claymills

New Vision for Water

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Advice Arctic Artificial Intelligence Autism Best for Britain Brexit Bristol climate Climate Change Community Cotswolds Craftivism Democracy Development Domestic Violence Economics Education Environment EU Farage Flood Gaza General Election Global Warming Housing Human Nature Oxford Pedestrian Planning pollution Populism Press release Private Equity Putin Region sewage technology Traffic Transport Trump University of Oxford VAWG video Westbury People's Gallery World War II
West England Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in West England and beyond.

West England Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Get involved
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 West England Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9739

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Europe
    • Health
    • Media
    • Transport
    • World
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Farming
    • Technology
    • Trade
  • Features
    • Broken Britain
    • Climate Emergency
    • Ukraine Conflict
    • Women in Focus
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Electoral Reform
    • Equality
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
  • Society
    • Book Reviews
    • Culture
    • Dance
    • Food
    • Heritage
    • Music
    • Poetry
    • Sport
  • Region
    • Bristol and Bath
    • Gloucestershire
    • Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    • Oxfordshire
    • Swindon
    • Wiltshire
    • Society
  • Opinion
  • Cartoons
  • Events
  • Sewage Watch
  • Get involved
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 West England Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9739